The Magazine and Website of the Science Fiction & Fantasy Field

Locus Online
Sub Menu contents

Recent Posts

Recent Comments



Site search


A collaborative blog by Locus editors, contributors, and other invited guests. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the authors, and do not reflect the editorial position of Locus Magazine or Locus Online.

(Earlier posts end here in April 2010)




Alvaro Zinos-Amaro


Alan Beatts
Terry Bisson
Marie Brennan
Karen Burnham
Siobhan Carroll
John Clute
F. Brett Cox
Ellen Datlow
Paul Di Filippo
Michael Dirda
Gardner Dozois
Andy Duncan
Stefan Dziemianowicz
Brian Evenson
Jeffrey Ford
Karen Joy Fowler
Kathleen Ann Goonan
Theodora Goss
Elizabeth Hand
Cecelia Holland
Rich Horton
Guy Gavriel Kay
James Patrick Kelly
Mark R. Kelly
Ellen Klages
Russell Letson
Karen Lord
Brit Mandelo
Adrienne Martini
Tim Pratt
Cat Rambo
Paul Graham Raven
Graham Sleight
Maureen Kincaid Speller
Peter Straub
Rachel Swirsky
Paul Witcover
Gary K. Wolfe
E. Lily Yu

Roundtable: All the Awards (Part 3 of 3)

« PreviousNext »

As usual, if you’d like to see the whole conversation on one page, select ‘View All’ from the drop down menu above. If you don’t see a drop down menu above, click here and it should show up.

Jonathan Strahan

I LOVE awards. I love them in a way that is probably slightly unbalanced. I love the annual nature of them, the sense of cycles turning and time passing. I love the nominations and announcements, the winners, the losers – all of it.  I have been an awards administrator, debated awards rules, an awards judge many times, and both a happy winner and a mostly happy loser of awards. I totally acknowledge all of the flaws with them — and there are many — but I do think they are important for two reasons we’ve touched on here. They help build a sense of community, and do contribute to a building picture of the work being done.  Do awards always get it right? Hell, no. Does it matter? Not that much. It’s more important that they exist and that we have them to talk about every year.

Gardner Dozois

I agree with Jonathan.

Rich Horton

Probably it’s related to editing Best of the Year volumes (that’s not really a joke — probably it is, I think!) but I agree with Gardner and Jonathan.

Of course I know that often the awards go to the wrong stories, and that they can be gamed, and that really great writers sometimes never get awards for any number of reasons, and that giving awards the year after the stories appear can look silly a few years later, and that many times there are several stories equally “good” in entirely different ways, such that it’s not reasonable to argue that one is “better” in any objective sense than the other …

Still and all, I like promoting stories for awards, and nominating them, and voting for them — and perhaps especially arguing about them after it’s all over! (As Gardner and I, among others, have been doing for some months in response to Jo Walton’s posts on the Hugos at

(Indeed, just this week we were discussing the year that The Fountains of Paradise beat On Wings of Song. Consensus is certainly that Disch’s novel was better (though my personal choice that year was Crowley’s Engine Summer.) … but I do also like the Clarke. (And Disch’s comment that Clarke would die first is a bit eerie when you consider that he did — but only by a few months.))

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


Pingback from About Awards « BIG OTHER
Time April 30, 2011 at 6:18 pm

[…] of awards always seems to arouse (in this iteration I’ve been most struck by the three-part discussion at […]

Write a comment

© 2010 by Locus Publications. All rights reserved. Powered by WordPress, modified from a theme design by Lorem Ipsum