posted by Karen Burnham at Monday 12 November 2012 @ 9:32 pm GMT
Reviews and reviewing. Why do we do it? Who is it for?
As always, this discussion is broken up into multiple pages for ease of reading. If you’d like to read it all on a single page, select ‘View All’ from the drop down menu above. If you don’t see the drop down menu, please click here.
Paul Di Filippo
I personally review for two reasons: 1) to keep abreast of the field and to keep my own fiction-writing skills sharp, by critically examining the skills of other writers; and 2) as a kind of pay-forward gesture in thanks for all the great fiction I’ve read which has shaped me. If I can alert other readers to good stuff, I’m spreading the joy. Oh, yeah, and a paycheck doesn’t hurt either!
Speaking as a bookseller (and being honest), the biggest reason I review is to sell books. Which is not to say that I’ll positively review a book that I don’t think is a worthwhile read. Given my position and audience, a positive review is a de facto recommendation and so I’m not going to suggest that people read something that I don’t think is good. By extension, I don’t write bad reviews because it’s not a productive use of my time.
A secondary reason that I write reviews are to draw attention to an author or work that I think is worthy of note and may be a bit under the radar.
Finally, I write reviews to draw attention to my business by adding content that interests people (I hope) to our blog and website.
In terms of what reviews do for me — again, being honest, they allow me to talk about books that I haven’t had time to read. There are so many books out there that it’s simply not possible for me to even read all the ones that get a lot of attention, let alone all the ones we stock. Reviews give me a fair idea of what a book is about and help me know what books to suggest to what customers. It’s certainly more accurate than publisher’s catalogs or, gods help me, back cover blurbs and flap-copy.
All my reviewing (and my editing) is an attempt to impose my taste onto readers. Let me clarify.
I write mini-reviews in my Best Horror of the Year. Some of those go into my Cemetery Dance column: “The Last Ten Books I’ve Read.” When I started co-editing The Year’s Best Fantasy and Horror I was way more negative about the books I thought were awful. After a few years, (and some negative feedback from those whose works I obviously disliked, the packager of that series (Jim Frenkel) asked me to reconsider what I was doing. His point was that 1) I was editing a “best” of the year so why include works I thought were awful in my limited space and 2) –note that this was before everything appeared and was saved on the web–that unlike a magazine, a book will last forever and that those negative reviews would be accessible for a very long time. I took his words to heart and don’t write killer reviews any more.
I’ve also come to realize that I enjoy pushing what I consider great work on readers rather than even mention the work I hope will die the death of obscurity.
When I began to review books, I did so absolutely for the money, such as it was. Later, I did it for two reasons: to draw attention to a book or writer I loved and wished to support; and to continue to take part in the ongoing cultural discussion, to add my voice to the endless argument.
Click here to continue reading.